<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=7141298&amp;fmt=gif">

3 min read

Congressional AI Activity Accelerates: What It Means for Housing and Technology

Congress is rapidly shifting from debating whether to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) to determining how to establish a lasting national framework. Several bipartisan proposals introduced last week reflect growing momentum toward federal action on AI governance, national security, and innovation.

For rental housing, these developments reinforce an important challenge: the United States needs a clear, national approach to AI that both protects consumers and provides certainty for the businesses and innovators using AI responsibly.

While much of the congressional debate continues to focus on regulating frontier AI model developers, policymakers should also recognize that millions of businesses—including organizations that provide housing—are deploying commercially available AI tools to improve housing affordability, operational efficiency, fraud prevention, maintenance, customer service, and resident experiences. Those organizations deserve regulatory certainty as well.

Policystack logo graphic

Key Legislative Developments

FRONTIER Act

Representatives Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and Lori Trahan (D-MA) introduced the bipartisan FRONTIER Act, establishing a national framework for AI governance. The legislation continues Congress’s effort to create consistent federal rules governing advanced AI systems while narrowing earlier preemption language that generated significant debate.

RETTC Perspective

RETTC supports efforts to establish a strong federal framework that avoids an increasingly fragmented patchwork of state AI laws. However, any national framework should extend beyond regulating AI developers alone.

Congress should ensure that:

  • Housing providers and other business users receive clear legal certainty when deploying commercially available AI responsibly.
  • Federal law preempts conflicting state requirements that regulate the use of AI in routine business operations.
  • Organizations following established federal standards are not subjected to inconsistent state compliance regimes.
  • Responsible innovation remains possible for startups, technology providers, and housing operators alike.

Without these protections, businesses could face conflicting obligations simply because they operate in multiple states, slowing adoption of technologies that improve affordability, efficiency, and renter outcomes.

AI Kill Switch Act

Representatives Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) introduced legislation that would authorize the Department of Homeland Security to suspend or disable advanced AI systems that present significant national security risks.

The proposal follows recent concerns surrounding advanced frontier models demonstrating unexpected autonomous capabilities.

RETTC Perspective

RETTC recognizes the importance of protecting national security and addressing catastrophic risks posed by highly capable frontier AI systems.

At the same time, Congress should carefully distinguish between:

  • frontier foundation model developers; and
  • businesses deploying commercially available AI applications in everyday operations.

Regulatory requirements designed for frontier model developers should not unintentionally burden housing providers or startups using established AI tools to improve housing operations.

Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act

A bipartisan coalition introduced the Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act, to strengthen protections against foreign theft and “distillation” of advanced American AI models. The legislation encourages greater information sharing among government and industry regarding AI-related cybersecurity threats.

RETTC Perspective

Strong cybersecurity and protection of American AI leadership are critical priorities.

RETTC has long supported collaborative approaches to cybersecurity across housing and believes protecting American AI innovation strengthens both national security and economic competitiveness.

RETTC’s Policy Priorities

As Congress continues developing a federal AI framework, RETTC believes several principles should guide policymakers:

  1. Establish a National Framework
    Businesses operating nationally should not face a patchwork of fifty different AI compliance laws. A consistent federal framework encourages innovation while providing consumers with clear protections regardless of where they live.

  2. Protect AI End Users
    Most businesses are not building frontier AI models—they are using commercially available technologies. Federal policy should provide safe harbors and legal certainty for organizations that deploy AI responsibly in accordance with established standards.

  3. Preserve Innovation
    Startups and technology providers need predictable rules that encourage investment rather than regulatory uncertainty. Innovation has become an essential driver of housing affordability, operational efficiency, fraud prevention, accessibility, and resident service.

  4. Focus Regulation Where Risk Exists
    Higher-risk obligations should apply to entities developing frontier AI models, while sector-specific guidance should govern responsible business applications. One-size-fits-all regulation risks slowing beneficial AI adoption without meaningfully improving consumer protection.

Housing Providers and Responsible Innovation

Responsible innovation is already a cornerstone among housing providers. They adhere to robust internal controls, existing legal protections, and regulatory requirements at the federal, state, and local level, including the Fair Housing Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Additionally, RETTC continues to support practical self-governance measures through the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Governance Framework for rental housing and technology partners. Innovation and consumer protection can advance together through the following principles:

  • transparency;
  • human oversight;
  • appropriate testing and validation;
  • privacy and cybersecurity protections;
  • ongoing monitoring for bias and unintended outcomes; and
  • accountability for responsible deployment.

Looking Ahead

Congress has clearly entered a new phase of AI policymaking. While much of today’s debate centers on regulating frontier AI developers, the next critical step will be ensuring that federal legislation also provides certainty for the millions of businesses that rely on AI every day.

For housing providers, technology companies, and startups, the question is no longer whether AI will be regulated—it is whether Congress will establish a framework that simultaneously:

  • protects consumers,
  • strengthens American innovation,
  • prevents a patchwork of conflicting state laws,
  • and provides clear rules for the responsible deployment of AI across the economy.

RETTC will continue working with Congress, federal agencies, and housing partners to ensure that any national AI framework recognizes both sides of the AI ecosystem: those who build AI and those who responsibly use it to solve real-world challenges—including expanding housing opportunity, improving affordability, and delivering better outcomes for renters.

You Might Also Like...

2025 Wrap Up: Advancements in Innovation, Affordability, and Responsible Tech

Although 2025 has come to a close, RETTC’s advocacy efforts are not slowing down. With a successful OPTECH conference behind us, RETTC has spent the...

Read More

Protect Consumers, Advance Innovation: Industry Leaders Press for National Data Privacy Framework

Data is king and everyone knows it...including criminals. Cyber-crime, already a multi-billion-dollar industry, is growing faster than ever before,...

Read More

Responsible AI Starts Here: A Governance Framework for Rental Housing

We can’t solve today’s housing challenges with yesterday’s tools. Artificial intelligence and emerging technologies are not just changing how rental...

Read More